National Technical Reports Library

The National Technical Information Service acquires, indexes, abstracts, and archives the largest collection of U.S. government-sponsored technical reports in existence. The NTRL offers online, free and open access to these authenticated government technical reports. Technical reports and documents in its repository may be available online for free either from the issuing federal agency, the U.S. Government Publishing Office’s Federal Digital System website, or through search engines.

Details

Columbia River Treaty 2014/2024 Review. United States Entity Supplemental Report. Appendix C.

PB2011111164

Publication Date	2010
Page Count	25
Abstract	In general, the planning and operation of the Canadian Treaty projects does not recognize operations not defined in the actual Treaty or Treaty Protocol. Since the Phase 1 studies were primarily focused on looking at the two fundamental river purposes defined under the Treaty, power and flood control, the studies did not include additional operations not considered under the Treaty. By approaching the Phase 1 studies from this Treaty standpoint, both the U.S. and Canadian Entities believed they created a baseline of information for comparison and to build from for future studies and for engagement with the sovereigns and stakeholders within their respective countries. However, since the Biological Opinions (BiOp) have such a strong influence on the U.S. operations, the U.S. Entity felt it was important to look at the Phase 1 study results with the Fish operations included. The purpose of this appendix is to describe the modeling, methodology and criteria used in the U.S. Entity Phase 1 Supplemental studies that were done to assess the impacts to the U.S. system and fish operations when BiOp requirements were overlaid on the Phase 1 studies. The Phase 1 studies referred to in this appendix are: 1. Treaty continues post-2024 and Called Upon flood control is implemented (Study A); 2. Treaty is terminated in 2024 and Called Upon flood control is implemented (Study B); and 3. Treaty continues post-2024 with largely the same Treaty operations as today (Study C). The purpose of this Appendix is to compare across Supplemental studies only.
Keywords	Water resources Rivers Treaties Electric power generation Hydroelectric power Negotiations Benefits payments Governance Implementation History Reviews United States Canada Columbia River Intertie PNCA agreement
Source Agency	Technical Information Center Oak Ridge Tennessee
Corporate Authors	Bonneville Power Administration, Portland, OR.
Supplemental Notes	See also PB2009-108123.
Document Type	Technical Report
NTIS Issue Number	201118

Columbia River Treaty 2014/2024 Review. United States Entity Supplemental Report. Appendix C.

Columbia River Treaty 2014/2024 Review. United States Entity Supplemental Report. Appendix C.
PB2011111164

Publication Date	2010
Page Count	25
Abstract	In general, the planning and operation of the Canadian Treaty projects does not recognize operations not defined in the actual Treaty or Treaty Protocol. Since the Phase 1 studies were primarily focused on looking at the two fundamental river purposes defined under the Treaty, power and flood control, the studies did not include additional operations not considered under the Treaty. By approaching the Phase 1 studies from this Treaty standpoint, both the U.S. and Canadian Entities believed they created a baseline of information for comparison and to build from for future studies and for engagement with the sovereigns and stakeholders within their respective countries. However, since the Biological Opinions (BiOp) have such a strong influence on the U.S. operations, the U.S. Entity felt it was important to look at the Phase 1 study results with the Fish operations included. The purpose of this appendix is to describe the modeling, methodology and criteria used in the U.S. Entity Phase 1 Supplemental studies that were done to assess the impacts to the U.S. system and fish operations when BiOp requirements were overlaid on the Phase 1 studies. The Phase 1 studies referred to in this appendix are: 1. Treaty continues post-2024 and Called Upon flood control is implemented (Study A); 2. Treaty is terminated in 2024 and Called Upon flood control is implemented (Study B); and 3. Treaty continues post-2024 with largely the same Treaty operations as today (Study C). The purpose of this Appendix is to compare across Supplemental studies only.
Keywords	Water resources Rivers Treaties Electric power generation Hydroelectric power Negotiations Benefits payments Governance Implementation History Reviews United States Canada Columbia River Intertie PNCA agreement
Source Agency	Technical Information Center Oak Ridge Tennessee
Corporate Authors	Bonneville Power Administration, Portland, OR.
Supplemental Notes	See also PB2009-108123.
Document Type	Technical Report
NTIS Issue Number	201118