National Technical Reports Library

The National Technical Information Service acquires, indexes, abstracts, and archives the largest collection of U.S. government-sponsored technical reports in existence. The NTRL offers online, free and open access to these authenticated government technical reports. Technical reports and documents in its repository may be available online for free either from the issuing federal agency, the U.S. Government Publishing Office’s Federal Digital System website, or through search engines.

Details

Impact of Body Armor on Physical Work Performance.

PB2008108710

Publication Date	2006
Personal Author	Ricciardi, R.
Page Count	44
Abstract	The purpose of this study is to identify the physiologic impact and health risks associated with wearing body armor and to develop strategies to prevent or mitigate negative health effects. Body armor is widely used by military, police, security, and first responder personnel for protection against fragmentation, handgun, and rifle projectile injuries. A within-subject, repeated-measures design was used. Thirty-four participants volunteered to undergo two experimental conditions while wearing or not wearing body armor. Subjects walked on a treadmill for 30 minutes at a slow and moderate pace and also completed a physical performance battery. Subjects wearing body armor, compared to not wearing it, had significantly greater increases in oxygen uptake at a slow and moderate pace; blood lactate at a moderate pace; heart rate at slow and moderate pace; and rating of perceived physical exertion at slow and moderate pace. Body armor significantly affected physical tasks: Under the body armor condition, men performed 61 percent fewer pull-ups, and body armor reduced womens hang time by 63 percent; stair stepping in men and women decreased by 16 percent. When examining gender differences, female and male subjects with body armor, as compared to those without body armor, had no significant differences in percentage increase in VO(sub 2), heart rate or respiratory rate at slow or moderate pace while walking and wearing body armor.
Keywords	Body armor Impact Human performance Physical loads Physiology Projectiles Health risks Health effects Law enforcement officers Protective clothing
Source Agency	TriService Nursing Research Program/Uniform Services Univ. of the Health Sciences
NTIS Subject Category	79A - Ammunition, Explosives, & Pyrotechnics 95D - Human Factors Engineering 57S - Physiology
Corporate Authors	TriService Nursing Research Program, Bethesda, MD.
Supplemental Notes	Sponsored by Uniformed Services Univ. of the Health Sciences, Bethesda, MD.
Document Type	Technical Report
Title Note	Final rept., July 1, 2005 to December 31, 2006
NTIS Issue Number	200813

Impact of Body Armor on Physical Work Performance.

Impact of Body Armor on Physical Work Performance.
PB2008108710

Publication Date	2006
Personal Author	Ricciardi, R.
Page Count	44
Abstract	The purpose of this study is to identify the physiologic impact and health risks associated with wearing body armor and to develop strategies to prevent or mitigate negative health effects. Body armor is widely used by military, police, security, and first responder personnel for protection against fragmentation, handgun, and rifle projectile injuries. A within-subject, repeated-measures design was used. Thirty-four participants volunteered to undergo two experimental conditions while wearing or not wearing body armor. Subjects walked on a treadmill for 30 minutes at a slow and moderate pace and also completed a physical performance battery. Subjects wearing body armor, compared to not wearing it, had significantly greater increases in oxygen uptake at a slow and moderate pace; blood lactate at a moderate pace; heart rate at slow and moderate pace; and rating of perceived physical exertion at slow and moderate pace. Body armor significantly affected physical tasks: Under the body armor condition, men performed 61 percent fewer pull-ups, and body armor reduced womens hang time by 63 percent; stair stepping in men and women decreased by 16 percent. When examining gender differences, female and male subjects with body armor, as compared to those without body armor, had no significant differences in percentage increase in VO(sub 2), heart rate or respiratory rate at slow or moderate pace while walking and wearing body armor.
Keywords	Body armor Impact Human performance Physical loads Physiology Projectiles Health risks Health effects Law enforcement officers Protective clothing
Source Agency	TriService Nursing Research Program/Uniform Services Univ. of the Health Sciences
NTIS Subject Category	79A - Ammunition, Explosives, & Pyrotechnics 95D - Human Factors Engineering 57S - Physiology
Corporate Authors	TriService Nursing Research Program, Bethesda, MD.
Supplemental Notes	Sponsored by Uniformed Services Univ. of the Health Sciences, Bethesda, MD.
Document Type	Technical Report
Title Note	Final rept., July 1, 2005 to December 31, 2006
NTIS Issue Number	200813