National Technical Reports Library

The National Technical Information Service acquires, indexes, abstracts, and archives the largest collection of U.S. government-sponsored technical reports in existence. The NTRL offers online, free and open access to these authenticated government technical reports. Technical reports and documents in its repository may be available online for free either from the issuing federal agency, the U.S. Government Publishing Office’s Federal Digital System website, or through search engines.

Details

DE82014221

Publication Date	1982
Personal Author	Dunson, J. B.; Eisenberg, A. M.; Schuyler, R. L.; Haight, H. G.; Mello, V. E.
Page Count	228
Abstract	A quantitative merit evaluation which assesses the relative difficulty of remote processing of Savannah River Plant high-level wastes for seven alternative waste forms is presented. The reference borosilicate glass process is rated as the simplest, followed by FUETAP concrete. The other processes evaluated in order of increasing complexity were: glass marbles in a lead matrix, high-silica glass, crystalline ceramic (Synroc-D and tailored ceramic), and coated ceramic particles. Cost appraisals are summarized for the borosilicate glass, high-silica glass, and ceramic waste form processing facilities. (ERA citation 07:042510)
Keywords	Radioactive waste processing Savannah river plant High-level radioactive wastes Comparative evaluations Solidification Borosilicate glass Glass Lead Matrix materials Silica Concretes Synroc process Ceramics Particles Coatings Cost ERDA/052001
Source Agency	Technical Information Center Oak Ridge Tennessee
NTIS Subject Category	77G - Radioactive Wastes & Radioactivity
Corporate Authors	Du Pont de Nemours (E.I.) and Co., Aiken, SC. Savannah River Lab.; Department of Energy, Washington, DC.
Supplemental Notes	Portions of document are illegible.
Document Type	Technical Report
NTIS Issue Number	198226
Contract Number	AC09-76SR00001

Assessment of Processes, Facilities, and Costs for Alternative Solid Forms for Immobilization of SRP Defense Waste.

Assessment of Processes, Facilities, and Costs for Alternative Solid Forms for Immobilization of SRP Defense Waste.
DE82014221

Publication Date	1982
Personal Author	Dunson, J. B.; Eisenberg, A. M.; Schuyler, R. L.; Haight, H. G.; Mello, V. E.
Page Count	228
Abstract	A quantitative merit evaluation which assesses the relative difficulty of remote processing of Savannah River Plant high-level wastes for seven alternative waste forms is presented. The reference borosilicate glass process is rated as the simplest, followed by FUETAP concrete. The other processes evaluated in order of increasing complexity were: glass marbles in a lead matrix, high-silica glass, crystalline ceramic (Synroc-D and tailored ceramic), and coated ceramic particles. Cost appraisals are summarized for the borosilicate glass, high-silica glass, and ceramic waste form processing facilities. (ERA citation 07:042510)
Keywords	Radioactive waste processing Savannah river plant High-level radioactive wastes Comparative evaluations Solidification Borosilicate glass Glass Lead Matrix materials Silica Concretes Synroc process Ceramics Particles Coatings Cost ERDA/052001
Source Agency	Technical Information Center Oak Ridge Tennessee
NTIS Subject Category	77G - Radioactive Wastes & Radioactivity
Corporate Authors	Du Pont de Nemours (E.I.) and Co., Aiken, SC. Savannah River Lab.; Department of Energy, Washington, DC.
Supplemental Notes	Portions of document are illegible.
Document Type	Technical Report
NTIS Issue Number	198226
Contract Number	AC09-76SR00001