National Technical Reports Library - NTRL

National Technical Reports Library

The National Technical Information Service acquires, indexes, abstracts, and archives the largest collection of U.S. government-sponsored technical reports in existence. The NTRL offers online, free and open access to these authenticated government technical reports. Technical reports and documents in its repository may be available online for free either from the issuing federal agency, the U.S. Government Publishing Office’s Federal Digital System website, or through search engines.




Details
Actions:
Download PDFDownload XML
Download

Drilling, Completion, and Data Collection Plans an Assessment of Geological Carbon Sequestration Options in the Illinois Basin: Phase 3.


DE151222708

Publication Date 2015
Personal Author Malkewicz, N.; Kirksey, J.; Finley, R.
Page Count 417
Abstract The Illinois Basin – Decatur Project (IBDP) is managed by the Midwest Geological Sequestration Consortium (MGSC) and is led by the Illinois State Geological Survey (ISGS) at the University of Illinois. The project site is located on the Archer Daniels Midland Company (ADM) property in Decatur, Illinois, and is a fully integrated carbon capture and storage (CCS) project that uses CO? captured from the ethanol-producing fermentation process at the ADM corn-processing plant (Finley et. al., 2013). IBDP has a goal of injecting one million tonnes of CO? into the basal sands of the Mt. Simon Sandstone over a three-year period. This is a multifaceted project, and this report details the planning and results of the drilling, completions, well testing, log data acquisition, and the Health, Safety, and Environment (HSE) aspects of the project. Three deep wells were planned for the IBDP: • The injection well: Injection Well #1 (CCS1); The monitoring well (both in-zone and above seal): Verification Well #1 (VW1); and • The geophone monitoring well: Geophysical Monitoring Well #1 (GM1). The detailed plans for these wells are attached to the appendices of this document. The wells were drilled successfully with little deviation from the original plans. The biggest change from the plan to execution was the need to adjust for larger-than-expected loss of circulation in the Potosi section of the Knox Formation. The completions reports also attached to this document detail the well constructions as they were actually built. Injectivity testing was carried out, and the perforating plans were adjusted based on the results. Additional perforations and acidizing were performed as a result of the injectivity testing. The testing plans are detailed in this report along with the actual testing results. The injectivity testing results were used in the modeling and simulation efforts. Detailed HSE plans were developed and implemented during the planning and execution phases of the project. The implementation included an HSE Bridging Document, which served to unify the HSE policies of the project partners and key subcontractors. The HSE plan and actual HSE results are presented in this document. There were no recordable HSE incidents during the project. A detailed logging program was developed based on project needs. The log data were acquired in accordance with the plan, and both the plan and log results are presented in this report. Log data were heavily utilized by the research staff, modelers, reservoir engineers, and for technical and permitting efforts. 5 Several key lessons were learned during the project: Safety in operations and execution is paramount and is only achieved through proper planning and behavior control. The certainty of this was reinforced through implementation of this lesson and the resultant flawless HSE performance during the project. Losses of drilling fluid circulation were larger than anticipated within the Potosi Formation. Circulation was only recovered through cementing the loss zones. When possible, minimizing complexity in permit requirements and well designs is preferable. he size of the wells were outside of the standard experience and expertise typical within the basin, and therefore required substantial planning and ramp-up of contractors and partners to meet project objectives. With multiple stakeholders and research partners, establishing objectives and requirements early and adhering to change request procedures throughout the project are critical to manage competing data and sampling objectives that may be detrimental to overall progress. The well construction and completion operations were successfully executed, with all wells built in a manner that achieved excellent wellbore integrity. Log planning involved a number of stakeholders and technical specialists. Data collection from logging, coring, and testing was excellent. Time and effort spent with the associated contractors and suppliers to develop a well plan beyond normal scope proved highly successful, resulting in a well-construction and completion project that surpassed expectations.
Keywords
  • Illinois Basin
  • Lignite coal
  • Environmental sciences
  • Coal
  • Peat
  • Petroleum & petroleum distillates
  • Natural gas supply
  • Fossil-fueled power plants
  • Engineering
  • Geosciences
Source Agency
  • Department of Energy General
NTIS Subject Category
  • 97K - Fuels
  • 97B - Energy Use, Supply, & Demand
  • 97F - Fuel Conversion Processes
  • 97R - Environmental Studies
  • 48G - Hydrology & Limnology
  • 68G - Environmental Health & Safety
Corporate Authors Illinois Univ., Urbana.
Document Type Technical Report
NTIS Issue Number 201909
Contract Number
  • FC26-05NT42588
Drilling, Completion, and Data Collection Plans an Assessment of Geological Carbon Sequestration Options in the Illinois Basin: Phase 3.
Drilling, Completion, and Data Collection Plans an Assessment of Geological Carbon Sequestration Options in the Illinois Basin: Phase 3.
DE151222708

  • Illinois Basin
  • Lignite coal
  • Environmental sciences
  • Coal
  • Peat
  • Petroleum & petroleum distillates
  • Natural gas supply
  • Fossil-fueled power plants
  • Engineering
  • Geosciences
  • Department of Energy General
  • 97K - Fuels
  • 97B - Energy Use, Supply, & Demand
  • 97F - Fuel Conversion Processes
  • 97R - Environmental Studies
  • 48G - Hydrology & Limnology
  • 68G - Environmental Health & Safety
  • FC26-05NT42588
Loading