National Technical Reports Library

The National Technical Information Service acquires, indexes, abstracts, and archives the largest collection of U.S. government-sponsored technical reports in existence. The NTRL offers online, free and open access to these authenticated government technical reports. Technical reports and documents in its repository may be available online for free either from the issuing federal agency, the U.S. Government Publishing Office’s Federal Digital System website, or through search engines.

Details

Methodologies for Blunt Trauma Assessment in Military Helmets.

ADA585970

Publication Date	2010
Personal Author	Hopping, J. A.; Bass, C.; Shridharani, J.; Perritt, C.; Haynes, N.
Page Count	12
Abstract	Since World War II, U.S. military combat helmets have provided various degrees of protection against ballistic threats, including fragments and bullets. Only recently, however, have combat helmets been specified to provide blunt impact protection. This study assesses the current generation of combat helmets and four commercial off the shelf (COTS) pad suspension systems (denoted A, B, C, and D) for blunt impact protection against realistic blunt impact threats including falls, parachute drops, and motor vehicle crashes using a drop test methodology based upon the Advanced Combat Helmet (ACH) Purchase Description (CO/PD-05-04) and the U.S. Department of Transportation (DOT) Laboratory Test Procedure for Motorcycle Helmets (TP-218-06). Three variant headforms (DOT, NOCSAE, and ISO) and three independent testing laboratories were used to examine 549 helmet samples with a total of 7,686 impacts. A single ballistic shell manufacturer was used to reduce potential variability. All five fielded helmet sizes (S, M, L, XL, and XXL) were included in the study, and impacts were conducted at three temperature conditions (263 5 K, 295 4 K, and 327 5 K) as well as at three impact velocities (3.0 0.1m/s, 4.3 0.1m/s, and 5.3 0.2m/s). For the DOT headform tests, hot temperature conditions showed substantially greater peak acceleration than the cold or ambient conditions (approximately 60g across all tests). Peak acceleration values from the first DOT headform impact averaged 30g less than those measured during a repeat impact. On average, the peak impact accelerations measured in the NOCSAE headform were 48g less than those measured in the DOT headform and 74g less than those measured in the ISO headform, across all velocities. As the impact velocities increased, this effect became more pronounced. Careful consideration should be given to advantages and disadvantages of each test headform for future testing. Detailed headform anthropometry may be an issue for assessment of higher performance helmets and should be further evaluated.
Keywords	Helmets Wounds and injuries Anthropometry Impact Pads(Cushions) Sizes(Dimensions) Statistics Test and evaluation Trauma Ach(Advanced combat helmets) Blunt impact protection Dot headforms Head injury assessment Headform anthropometry Helmet test methods Iso headforms Laboratory test procedure for motorcycle helmets Monorail drop tower Nocsae headforms Pad suspension systems Tp-218-06 Fit
Source Agency	Non Paid ADAS
NTIS Subject Category	57A - Anatomy 57S - Physiology 57E - Clinical Medicine 72F - Statistical Analysis
Supplemental Notes	The original document contains color images. Prepared in collaboration with the Dept of Biomedical Engineering, Duke Univ, Durham, NC. Presented at the Personal Armour Systems Symposium 2010 (PASS 2010).
Document Type	Technical Report
Title Note	Conference paper.
NTIS Issue Number	201404

Methodologies for Blunt Trauma Assessment in Military Helmets.

Methodologies for Blunt Trauma Assessment in Military Helmets.
ADA585970

Publication Date	2010
Personal Author	Hopping, J. A.; Bass, C.; Shridharani, J.; Perritt, C.; Haynes, N.
Page Count	12
Abstract	Since World War II, U.S. military combat helmets have provided various degrees of protection against ballistic threats, including fragments and bullets. Only recently, however, have combat helmets been specified to provide blunt impact protection. This study assesses the current generation of combat helmets and four commercial off the shelf (COTS) pad suspension systems (denoted A, B, C, and D) for blunt impact protection against realistic blunt impact threats including falls, parachute drops, and motor vehicle crashes using a drop test methodology based upon the Advanced Combat Helmet (ACH) Purchase Description (CO/PD-05-04) and the U.S. Department of Transportation (DOT) Laboratory Test Procedure for Motorcycle Helmets (TP-218-06). Three variant headforms (DOT, NOCSAE, and ISO) and three independent testing laboratories were used to examine 549 helmet samples with a total of 7,686 impacts. A single ballistic shell manufacturer was used to reduce potential variability. All five fielded helmet sizes (S, M, L, XL, and XXL) were included in the study, and impacts were conducted at three temperature conditions (263 5 K, 295 4 K, and 327 5 K) as well as at three impact velocities (3.0 0.1m/s, 4.3 0.1m/s, and 5.3 0.2m/s). For the DOT headform tests, hot temperature conditions showed substantially greater peak acceleration than the cold or ambient conditions (approximately 60g across all tests). Peak acceleration values from the first DOT headform impact averaged 30g less than those measured during a repeat impact. On average, the peak impact accelerations measured in the NOCSAE headform were 48g less than those measured in the DOT headform and 74g less than those measured in the ISO headform, across all velocities. As the impact velocities increased, this effect became more pronounced. Careful consideration should be given to advantages and disadvantages of each test headform for future testing. Detailed headform anthropometry may be an issue for assessment of higher performance helmets and should be further evaluated.
Keywords	Helmets Wounds and injuries Anthropometry Impact Pads(Cushions) Sizes(Dimensions) Statistics Test and evaluation Trauma Ach(Advanced combat helmets) Blunt impact protection Dot headforms Head injury assessment Headform anthropometry Helmet test methods Iso headforms Laboratory test procedure for motorcycle helmets Monorail drop tower Nocsae headforms Pad suspension systems Tp-218-06 Fit
Source Agency	Non Paid ADAS
NTIS Subject Category	57A - Anatomy 57S - Physiology 57E - Clinical Medicine 72F - Statistical Analysis
Supplemental Notes	The original document contains color images. Prepared in collaboration with the Dept of Biomedical Engineering, Duke Univ, Durham, NC. Presented at the Personal Armour Systems Symposium 2010 (PASS 2010).
Document Type	Technical Report
Title Note	Conference paper.
NTIS Issue Number	201404